Three canonical models of Oligopoly
Henrich von Stackelberg
1905-1946
"Stackelberg competition": Cournot-style competition, two (or more) firms compete on quantity to sell the same good
Again, firms' joint output determines the market price faced by all firms
But firms set their quantities sequentially
Example: Return to Saudi Arabia (sa) and Iran (i), again with the market (inverse) demand curve: P=200−3QQ=qsa+qi
Example: Return to Saudi Arabia (sa) and Iran (i), again with the market (inverse) demand curve: P=200−3QQ=qsa+qi
q∗sa=30−0.5qiq∗i=30−0.5qsa
q∗sa=30−0.5qiq∗i=30−0.5qsa
q∗i=30−0.5qsa
q∗sa=30−0.5qiq∗i=30−0.5qsa
q∗i=30−0.5qsa
P=200−3qsa−3(30−0.5qsa)P=110−1.5qsa
P=200−3qsa−3(30−0.5qsa)P=110−1.5qsa
P=200−3qsa−3(30−0.5qsa)P=110−1.5qsa
MRLeader=110−3qsa
MRLeader=MC110−3qsa=2030=q∗sa
MRLeader=MC110−3qsa=2030=q∗sa
q∗i=30−0.5qsaq∗i=30−0.5(30)q∗i=15
P=200−3(45)P=65
P=200−3(45)P=65
πsa=30(65−20)πsa=$1,350
P=200−3(45)P=65
πsa=30(65−20)πsa=$1,350
πi=15(65−20)πi=$675
Leader Saudi Arabia ↑ its output and ↑ profits
Follower Iran forced to ↓ its output and accept ↓ profits
Stackelberg leader clearly has a first-mover advantage over the follower
If firms compete simultaneously (Cournot): q∗=20, π=1,200 each
Leading ≻ simultaneous ≻ Following
Stackelberg Nash equilibrium requires perfect information for both leader and follower
Imperfect information reduces the game to (simultaneous) Cournot competition
Again, leader cannot act like a monopolist
Leader's choice of 30 is optimal only if follower responds with 15
Where subscript m is monopoly (collusion), c is Cournot, s is Stackelberg, b is Bertrand
Each of you is one Airline competing against another in a duopoly
LeadAir first chooses its number of flights, publicly announced
FollowAir then chooses its number of flights
Three canonical models of Oligopoly
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
Esc | Back to slideshow |
Three canonical models of Oligopoly
Henrich von Stackelberg
1905-1946
"Stackelberg competition": Cournot-style competition, two (or more) firms compete on quantity to sell the same good
Again, firms' joint output determines the market price faced by all firms
But firms set their quantities sequentially
Example: Return to Saudi Arabia (sa) and Iran (i), again with the market (inverse) demand curve: P=200−3QQ=qsa+qi
Example: Return to Saudi Arabia (sa) and Iran (i), again with the market (inverse) demand curve: P=200−3QQ=qsa+qi
q∗sa=30−0.5qiq∗i=30−0.5qsa
q∗sa=30−0.5qiq∗i=30−0.5qsa
q∗i=30−0.5qsa
q∗sa=30−0.5qiq∗i=30−0.5qsa
q∗i=30−0.5qsa
P=200−3qsa−3(30−0.5qsa)P=110−1.5qsa
P=200−3qsa−3(30−0.5qsa)P=110−1.5qsa
P=200−3qsa−3(30−0.5qsa)P=110−1.5qsa
MRLeader=110−3qsa
MRLeader=MC110−3qsa=2030=q∗sa
MRLeader=MC110−3qsa=2030=q∗sa
q∗i=30−0.5qsaq∗i=30−0.5(30)q∗i=15
P=200−3(45)P=65
P=200−3(45)P=65
πsa=30(65−20)πsa=$1,350
P=200−3(45)P=65
πsa=30(65−20)πsa=$1,350
πi=15(65−20)πi=$675
Leader Saudi Arabia ↑ its output and ↑ profits
Follower Iran forced to ↓ its output and accept ↓ profits
Stackelberg leader clearly has a first-mover advantage over the follower
If firms compete simultaneously (Cournot): q∗=20, π=1,200 each
Leading ≻ simultaneous ≻ Following
Stackelberg Nash equilibrium requires perfect information for both leader and follower
Imperfect information reduces the game to (simultaneous) Cournot competition
Again, leader cannot act like a monopolist
Leader's choice of 30 is optimal only if follower responds with 15
Where subscript m is monopoly (collusion), c is Cournot, s is Stackelberg, b is Bertrand
Each of you is one Airline competing against another in a duopoly
LeadAir first chooses its number of flights, publicly announced
FollowAir then chooses its number of flights